(Judge J Anthony Miller)
COJCoct by on Scribd
For both complaints, the COJC said, "Notably missing from this list is the review of judicial decisions involving potential error of law or a mistake of fact. Instead, jurisdiction in this area is vested exclusively in the Appellate courts."The COJC investigates violations of the Oklahoma Code on Judicial Conduct, violations include bias, appearance of impropriety, impropriety, and lack of courteousness.
Oklahoma Code of Judicial Conduct by mikekvolpe on Scribd
The first case I complained about was Stephen Thompson; Thompson had his child support set illegally at more than half his gross income and kept there; his ex-wife kept him away from his daughter (one of four children he had) for over a year, and Miller ignored his motions for months.When Thompson complained that his child support/alimony was more than half his gross income, Miller said, "he'll just have to figure it out," which I argued, unsuccessfully obviously, was discourteous, and strictly prohibited by the Oklahoma Code on Judicial Conduct.
At one point, Miller ordered Thompson to take a hair follicle drug test, while ordering his ex to pay for it. Miller made this order even though Thompson was steadily employed as a flight nurse with no history of drug use.
Then, when Thompson passed, Miller ruled that Thompson would be "presumed positive" unless he paid for the test as well.
"A judge should respect and comply with the law and act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary." The Oklahoma Code on Judicial Conduct states.
By the time Miller was moved from the case in August 2018, Thompson was broke and hadn't seen his daughter in over a year. I guess the appeals court, according Taylor Henderson, can create a time machine and give him his year back with his daughter.
The second involved a protective order which was dismissed despite fifty documented incidents of physical abuse. More on that story below.
Ironically, Miller was recently demoted from the family court docket, in order to handle protective orders exclusively.
This is the third complaint of mine which has been dismissed Taylor Henderson and the COJC.
Here is more on my previous complaint being rejected.
In that case, he forced a pro se litigant, Tanya Hathaway, to continue with a trial even after she'd suffered a panic attack. When she suffered a second panic attack, he forced her to continue with a subpoena, served to her while she was being treated. When she told Miller she'd taken a drug which effectively knocked her out, Miller struck her statement from the record and continued.
Recording of the shocking event is below.
As I've said repeatedly, Ms. Henderson thinks it is her job to protect bad judges like Miller from litigants and not the other way around, and as such, she is a part of the Oklahoma Deep State.
Lastly, check out a law, the Taylor Henderson Act, I dreamed up based on my interactions with Ms. Henderson.
No comments:
Post a Comment