Welcome to the Oklahoma Deep State

The Oklahoma Council on Judicial Complaints (COJC) replied to two of my complaints against Tulsa Special Judge J Anthony Miller.

                                                           (Judge J Anthony Miller)

COJCoct by on Scribd

For both complaints, the COJC said, "Notably missing from this list is the review of judicial decisions involving potential error of law or a mistake of fact. Instead, jurisdiction in this area is vested exclusively in the Appellate courts."

The COJC investigates violations of the Oklahoma Code on Judicial Conduct, violations include bias, appearance of impropriety, impropriety, and lack of courteousness.

Oklahoma Code of Judicial Conduct by mikekvolpe on Scribd

The first case I complained about was Stephen Thompson; Thompson had his child support set illegally at more than half his gross income and kept there; his ex-wife kept him away from his daughter (one of four children he had) for over a year, and Miller ignored his motions for months.

When Thompson complained that his child support/alimony was more than half his gross income, Miller said, "he'll just have to figure it out," which I argued, unsuccessfully obviously, was discourteous, and strictly prohibited by the Oklahoma Code on Judicial Conduct.

At one point, Miller ordered Thompson to take a hair follicle drug test, while ordering his ex to pay for it. Miller made this order even though Thompson was steadily employed as a flight nurse with no history of drug use.

Then, when Thompson passed, Miller ruled that Thompson would be "presumed positive" unless he paid for the test as well.

"A judge should respect and comply with the law and act at all times in a manner that  promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary." The Oklahoma Code on Judicial Conduct states. 

By the time Miller was moved from the case in August 2018, Thompson was broke and hadn't seen his daughter in over a year. I guess the appeals court, according Taylor Henderson, can create a time machine and give him his year back with his daughter.

The second involved a protective order which was dismissed despite fifty documented incidents of physical abuse.  More on that story below.
Ironically, Miller was recently demoted from the family court docket, in order to handle protective orders exclusively.

This is the third complaint of mine which has been dismissed Taylor Henderson and the COJC.

Here is more on my previous complaint being rejected.

In that case, he forced a pro se litigant, Tanya Hathaway, to continue with a trial even after she'd suffered a panic attack. When she suffered a second panic attack, he forced her to continue with a subpoena, served to her while she was being treated. When she told Miller she'd taken a drug which effectively knocked her out, Miller struck her statement from the record and continued.

Recording of the shocking event is below.




As I've said repeatedly, Ms. Henderson thinks it is her job to protect bad judges like Miller from litigants and not the other way around, and as such, she is a part of the Oklahoma Deep State.

Lastly, check out a law, the Taylor Henderson Act, I dreamed up based on my interactions with Ms. Henderson.

The Oklahoma Council on Judicial Complaints Continues Protecting the Orwellian Judge J Anthony Miller

My complaint against Tulsa Special District Judge J Anthony Miller has been rejected. Their claim is that he did not violate the Oklahoma Code on Judicial Conduct.

1090_001 by mikekvolpe on Scribd

Here is my original complaint.

Complaint to Oklahoma Council on Judicial Complaints by mikekvolpe on Scribd

Here is the original article.

The Oklahoma Code on Judicial Conduct includes avoiding impropriety, the appearance of impropriety, bias, and always acting in a professional manner.

In this case, the judge allowed blatant forum shopping, stayed on the case despite not only going to law school with a litigant but being a mediator in the beginning of the case.The COJC only acknowledged that he went to law school with a litigant, conveniently forgetting that the judge wore two hats, which is a blatant violation and shows not only bias but impropriety.

Also, through his actions, he caused a pro se litigant to suffer a panic attack. Following the panic attack, the judge forced her back into court with  a subpoena and then ignored her when she said she took a drug which effectively knocked her out.

This, according to Taylor Henderson of the COJC, does NOT constitute impropriety, the appearance of imporpriety, or bias. That's because Taylor Henderson is a typical corrupt bureaucrat; she protects bad judges from litigants. She is part of the problem.

Also note, at the end of the letter, Henderson even says the COJC is not allowed to speak to me, the person who submitted the complaint, anymore. How is that for transparency?

Also, I've learned that the COJC is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act, here is more from the corrupt Ms. Henderson: "The Oklahoma Open Records Act is the State of Oklahoma’s equivalent to the federal Freedom of Information Act to which you reference.  Pursuant to Title 51, Section 24A.3.2 of the Oklahoma Statutes, the Council on Judicial Complaints is specifically exempted from the Oklahoma Open Records Act and its records are not subject to public inspection."

So, the COJC does everything in secret, will tell you nothing, and by law does not have to release their records. 

This is the most transparency the COJC has ever felt. 

I do still have two more complaints against the Orwellian Judge J Anthony Miller that the COJC must deal with and I'm sure I'll get a standard form letter like this one. That's because Taylor Henderson protects bad judges from the litigants, not the other way around. 

The raw audio of the day the Orwellian Miller caused Tanya Hathaway's panic attack, ignored it, then ordered her back into the courtroom while she was being treated through a subpoena is below.

My Response to the Oklahoma Council on Judicial Complaints

I filed a complaint against Tulsa Special Judge J. Anthony Miller with the Oklahoma Council on Judicial Complaints (COJC).

My initial complaint was rejected. See photo below.

I disagreed with their assessment and filed a follow up with Taylor Henderson, the COJC Administrative Director. That is below. For reference, here is the Oklahoma Code of Judicial Conduct. 

Complaint to Oklahoma Council on Judicial Complaints by mikekvolpe on Scribd

Find the whole story involving this case here. 

Finally, I discussed how Miller violated Tanya Hathaway's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act, here's the audio of that happening.

On Reach Out America

I talk about the Rucki case as well as Tanya Hathaway's case.

Find more on Tanya Hathaway's case here.