Buy My Book Here

Fox News Ticker

Please check out my new books, "Bullied to Death: Chris Mackney's Kafkaesque Divorce and Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and the World's Last Custody Trial"

Sunday, June 17, 2018

TnT Tanya TalkS: Stephen Thompson Pt.2 & Mary Roma Gage

Find more on Stephen Thompson's story here. 

But the Orwellian Special Judge J Anthony Miller is not the only corrupt judge in Tulsa County.

Also, on the broadcast is Mary Roma. TnT Tanya TalkS introduces her story this way.

MARY ROMA GAGE START HER OUTRAGEOUS AIL SENTENCE given the initial abuse by Tulsa District Court and the reprehensible set ups. Recently Mary’s (we call her Roma) matter was transferred to a remote court outside of Tulsa County. This is one of countless actions that one would seem to believe is to cover up Tulsa’s courtroom abuse by the Judge and attorney’s that seem to continue to make themselves quite a living by heisting trusts of unsuspecting victims who have lost their loved ones. So what did Roma do? She filed for what rightfully belongs to her family.
This is an earlier podcast with Mary prior to being sentenced to jail and they last minute presented another charge and 20k in fines on a contempt charge she had no prior notice of. This is all CONJURED TO STEAL MONEY THAT HER PARENTS LEFT FOR HER FAMILY NOT CORRUPT ATTORNEYS
Also, check out Tanya Hathaway's story here.

Part one of Stephen Thompson's interview is below.

Thursday, June 14, 2018

Dalton Facing Jail for 4 Emails

The persecution of Natalia Dalton continues.

As I recently documented on American Legal News, Dalton had a son born with her ex-boyfriend, Julio LoCayo in 2008.

For the first six years, Natalia Dalton had physical custody of their son and the ex-couple only appeared in court once to argue.

Custody was switched in April 2014- in what was supposed to be a routine status conference- after LoCayo’s lawyers filed an emergency motion claiming Dalton had come to school barefoot and custody needed to be switched as a result.

Since 2014, when custody was switched, they have appeared a hundred times and more, almost always initiated by LoCayo, with LoCayo and his attorney going into court repeatedly to reduce and ultimately eliminate any time Dalton still has with her son.

It’s gotten so bad that the court is now entertaining a motion by LoCayo which would limit Dalton to four hours per month with her son which would be supervised, and she would pay for it. Dalton is ordered to pay $150 for each two hour session. 

Worse than that, Dalton faces up more than $40,000 in fees and penalties and 37 days in jail.
Approximately six months ago, after losing a series of so-called show cause motions- the court restricted Dalton’s access to her children by forbidding her from having any contact with any doctor about her son.

The court justified this stance by claiming that Dalton has brought forward a series of frivolous allegations against LoCayo.

After noticing a change in her son’s prescription, Dalton did contact her son’s doctor, who indeed noticed the prescription was being administered inaccurately, but since this still violated a court order, Dalton faces a new sanction and Alexandria (Virginia) Circuit Court Judge Lisa Kemler will consider a motion made by LoCayo’s attorney, Donnie Colton, to have Dalton sent to jail for as much as 37 days on June 15, 2018.

Colton and Kemler did not respond to emails for comment.

Enter Debra Bray

Debra Bray is an attorney in Virginia and on March 15, 2018, she was appointed as the new Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) on the custody matter.

Her findings since have helped the court continue to persecute Dalton.

For instance, in an affidavit submitted on May, 17, 2018, “This last year witnessed a reversal in the minor child’s behavior concurrent with mother unable to accept father as sole custodian.” Bray continued, “Mother has already involved the courts, CPS, and the police in allegations of physical abuse of the child and they were dismissed every time.”

Bray notes that the child first started exhibiting behavioral issues in late 2013, at almost the exact moment when Dalton said she noticed her son becoming more aggressive with visits to his father.

But Bray made an even more egregious statement in the affidavit: “The previous GAL has done a thorough investigation and found it (the allegations of abuse) to be without merit. The undersigned GAL (Bray) has met with the minor child privately while neither parent was present in the building and the child made no disclosures. I provided him every opportunity and even when discussing discipline and the home environment, the child did not convey concerns.”

Dalton said that Bray told her that was not Bray’s place to ask the child about abuse but rather the child would disclose if he wanted to.

Indeed, it is unclear how either Bray or the previous GAL to whom she gives so much credence, Isabel Kaldenbach, are in any way qualified to determine if abuse is real.

Kaldenbach, Dalton told me, downplayed the abuse in a previous hearing by saying it was in the past
Both are lawyers. Kaldenbach told me she was not trained in child abuse but in advocating for a child.

She was trained, she told me, by the Virginia Supreme Court, which would have no special training in spotting abuse either.

Bray did not respond to an email for comment.

LoCayo has been arrested several times, convicted of crimes more than once; Dalton provided photos, police reports, medical reports, her own testimony, and testimony of friends who witnessed his abusive nature to back up her allegations of abuse.

In one police report from 2013, LoCayo allegedly pushed her into an open-door frame before slamming the door in her face during an argument. She had bruises on her back and filed a police report immediately after the incident.


So-called Judge Lisa Kemler sentenced Natalia to five days in jail and did not fine her. 

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Monday, June 11, 2018

Conservative Law & Politics: Child Support Abuse

Check me out talking child support.

The three stories covered are:

1) Cedomir Zuric from Chicago: here's my article about him

2) Stephen Thompson from Tulsa, Oklahoma: here's my article about him. Also, find Stephen on TnT Tanya TalkS with Tanya Hathaway below. 

3) Carlos Rivera from New York City: an interview about his case below. 

Natalia Dalton on TS Radio with Marti Oakley

Find my article about Natalia's case here. 

Saturday, June 9, 2018

Orwellian (And So-Called Judge) Miller Strikes Again!

A man with no history of drug use was first ordered to take a drug test and then ordered to pay for it when it came back clean during his divorce.

It’s the latest example of judicial hubris and abuse by a growing list of litigants in the Court #349 of the Tulsa District Court where the Orwellian Judge J Anthony Miller presides.

                                                      (Orwellian Tulsa Distric Special Judge J Anthony Miller)

Stephen Thompson is a flight nurse with a steady job and he said he has no history of drug abuse.

The order further noted: "It is further adjudicated, ordered, and decreed by the courts that the cost shall be prepaid by the Petitioner (Thompson's ex-wife) and if Respondent's results are positive for the substance, the cost of Respondent's said drug screening shall be reimbursed by the Respondent to the Petitioner."

Despite Miller's own court order, in July 2017, even after his drug test came back negative, Thompson was told his test would be “presumed positive” if he didn’t pay for it.

Indeed, according to an April 24, 2017, court order signed by the Orwellian Miller, Thompson is ordered to take a drug screen: “It is therefore ordered, adjudicated, and decreed by the court that it has been fully advised and with good cause hereby orders that the Petitioner submit a hair sample.”

See order below.

But on July 12, 2017, the on-line docket shows an entry- currently at least- for a “presumed positive” test.

Thompson said this episode is only one injustice in a year plus process which has put him on the brink of financial ruin, threatened with jail, and worse yet, he said he’s been systematically removed from his four children’s lives by his ex-wife.

An email to Miller’s law clerk, Shana Grandstaff, was not returned.

A petition was filed for divorce between Deshonda Thompson and Stephen Thompson in Tulsa County District Court on February 16, 2017.

Thompson said he makes approximately $4,300 per month in income but between child support and alimony, more than half his gross income is confiscated.

“On March 8th 2017, I was informed that my child support would be calculated out to $1337/mo based off of my income, that was coming from my attorney, I thought that was a bit steep, but what do I know." Thompson said of what happened next. "Turns out, it was definitely miscalculated. I go to court on April 24th, I believe, 2017 and my pay stubs are introduced as evidence, Judge Miller orders me to pay the current child support as well as $900/mo in alimony and Judge Miller states, and I quote, ‘He will just have to figure it out.’ I was also forced to take a drug test for the sole fact that my ex would pay for it, even though I didn't meet any statue saying that I needed to.

“I end up getting evicted from my apartment and my car repossessed. The summer of 2017 my ex kept the kids from me, and on June 1st, 2017, my daughter was grounded from me, and I have a recording stating such. I hired a new attorney in July and go back to court later that month because she wants to move out of town and she wants me drug test to be deemed positive (side note, I am a nail biter, she knows that, wouldn't allow for a hair follicle, I h ad to wait a month for my nails to grow, all while paying $25 a week to go in and them tell me to come back). I go to court, Judge Miller orders me to pay for the drug test, the one he only allowed because she was going to pay for it, and I get some sort of visitation reestablished, he didn't care that the kids were withheld from me for the summer and didn't give me the opportunity to state anything about my daughter being grounded from me.”

An email to Deshonda Thompsons’ attorney, Kameran Ritzhaupt, was left unreturned.

But Thomson said his attorney was not able to file a petition to modify the child support order until 
November 2017, and that has still not been heard by the Orwellian Miller. Thompson said this happened despite that from May 21- August 17, 2017, he didn’t see any of his four children at all.

He hasn’t seen one of his children, his daughter who is grounded from him, since June 1, 2017.
“For over a year, my ex keeps saying my child has issues with me but won’t say what those issues are.” Thompson said on Conservative Law & Politics.

But Thompson said the abuse only got worse as 2017 turned into 2018.

“In February (2018) I go back to court, and again he doesn't have time to hear my motions, and my attorney pleas on my behalf and waives my right to a trial by jury, unbeknownst to me. 

 “I go back to court in April and yet again, my motions aren't heard, it gets pawned off until May. 

“On May 11th, I go back to court. This time I overhear Judge Miller say that he will find me guilty of contempt, even before a trial, I hear this judge already have a preconceived notion that I am guilty after hearing no evidence whatsoever. I am forced to plead no contest, since my right to a jury trial had already been waived, so I can remain out of jail until September when I have a status hearing on that issue. Meanwhile, once again, my motions about child support/alimony and me not seeing my daughter are all pawned off.”

Thompson has been represented by for parts of the ordeal by Matt Ingham and other parts of the ordeal by Cliff Stark. Emails to both were left unreturned. 

Emails to Alex Gerszewski and Terri Watkins, press secretaries for Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter, and to Sally Van Schenk, press secretary for Tulsa District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler, about the forming pattern of abuse in Miller's courtroom were left unreturned. 

On March 12, 2018, I along with another Orwellian Judge Miller victim Tanya Hathaway, wrote her story; you can find that story here.

A podcast discussing her case is also below.

Tanya has started her own show, TnT Tanya TalkS, and among her guests was a third victim of the Orwellian Miller, Ashley. That podcast is below.
Hathaway started the Facebook page “Injustice in Oklahoma” where the list of victims of  the Sooner State's judicial, law enforcement, and political abuse grows daily.  She also interviewed Stephen Thompson and that podcast is below. 

House Financial Services Committee Advances Venture Exchanges

The article is here. 

Thursday, June 7, 2018

CFTC and SEC Chairs Face Appropriations Committee

The article is here. 

On FACEUS Talking About Natalia Dalton's Case

More on Natalia Dalton's case here. 

Natalia faces 37 days in jail and fines of nearly $50,000 for sending emails to make sure her son was medicated properly. Find out more at the podcast...

Monday, June 4, 2018

Sunday, June 3, 2018

TnT Tanya TalkS with Stephen Thompson

Check me out at the beginning of the broadcast with an update on the Hathaway case. Please read Tanya Hathaway's story "New Hampshire Woman Takes on Oklahoma" here.

Stephen Thompson, the guest on the above podcast, experienced corruption in front of the same judge Tulsa District Special Judge J. Anthony Miller.

Stephen Thompson was on with Tanya Hathaway on TnT Tanya TalkS and Tanya Hathaway described his case below:

Our guest, Stephen Thompson, is yet another victim (and more are coming out of the woodwork) of Special Judge J. Anthony Miller, of Tulsa District Courthouse, where he will share his nightmare in courtroom # 349.(I personally begin to hyperventilate thinking about that evil excuse for justice. )
This is yet-another family case gone wild!
Stephen’s Constitutional Rights have seemingly been violated- motions ignored- suppressed and oppressed…. Parental alienation ignored- suborned, and seemingly applauded by Judge Miller when Stephen tries to enforce existing orders- instead, it’s more like he was punished.
Although we know one thing for sure that Miller is bias over (in my opinion) is protecting his self interest regardless of gender as a litigant; I certainly understand, as plenty can I imagine- why Stephen has the following to say about his ongoing experience with the Orwellian Miller.
Quotes from Stephen: 
“This is the first time I have had to deal with lawyers and courts. From the beginning I have felt like I have been hustled from all sides”.
“After experiencing the things that I have gone through, I have realized that the system creates more “deadbeat dads” than there would be otherwise and the kids best interest, which this should all be about, goes by the wayside. “

I've referred to so-called Judge Miller as the Orwellian Judge Miller. Stephen was forced to take a drug test; the reason being was that his ex-wife agreed to pay for it even though he had a job and no history of drug use. 

Then, when the test came back negative, the Orwellian Miller ordered Stephen to pay for the test or have it be deemed positive. How's that for Orwellian? 

There is a second documented case of Orwellian Judge Miller victimizing a litigant. Tanya Hathaway and TnT Tanya TalkS also interviewed Ashley. That podcast is below. 

The podcast about Tanya Hathaway's story is below; Hathway makes it three Orwellian Judge Miller victims. Please read Tanya Hathaway's story "New Hampshire Woman Takes on Oklahoma" here.

New Fintech Company Brings Diversity to Alternative Investing

The article is here. 

Friday, June 1, 2018

Now Minnesota Targeting Sandra Grazzini-Rucki With Child Support

                                                                    (Sandra Grazzini-Rucki)

Sandra Grazzini-Rucki has been out of jail for less than a month but she’s in danger of going back, this time for child support.
Sandra Grazzini-Rucki finally completed her prison sentence from her 2016 conviction for parental deprivation in May, but the law wasted no time going after her again.
While still in prison, Grazzini-Rucki was served with a child support order which mandates she pay her multi-millionaire ex-husband, David Rucki, $950 per month in child support starting on June 1, 2018.
Sandra Grazzini-Rucki is homeless, penniless, and hasn’t worked in approximately three years while David Rucki owns four homes, nine classic cars, and a multi-million dollar business but that didn’t stop Magistrate Judge Maria Pastoor from imposing the child support order.
The order was first imposed in the summer 2016 while her criminal trial was ongoing, but it was suspended while she was serving time.
But that came to an end with an order dated May 17, 2018.
“The support terms of the October 13, 2016, are hereby reinstated on June 1, 2018.”
Remarkably, Pastoor even claimed that the multi-millionaire David Rucki was on public assistance, “The father receives non-public assistance from (Social Security) Title IVD.”
This, Pastoor claimed, was evidence he was in need of child support and not evidence of fraud.
Remarkably, David Rucki has maintained one attorney, Lisa Elliott, since 2012 continuously while also hiring other attorneys like Marshall Tanick to handle other legal matters throughout.
Somehow he’s able to afford $400 per hour attorneys regularly but still needs $975 per month in child support.
“The court acknowledges that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki currently earns no money but used the concept of imputed income to justify its ruling.
“Imputed income allows judges to base child support on an income level the judge deems is reasonable even if the party is not currently earning that living.
Pastoor and Flaskamps-Halbrooks, based on their rulings, believe that Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, who is convicted of six felonies, is capable of making approximately $65,000 per year, the amount equivalent to $975 per month in child support.
Not only did David Rucki receive sole custody of the couple’s five children but he also received 100% of a multi-million dollar estate in a ruling by Judge David Knutson.
Knutson, Pastoor, and Flaskamps-Halbrooks have declined repeated requests to explain their rulings.
An email to the court’s public affairs office was also left unreturned.
Grazzini-Rucki has appealed theruling saying in part, “All of the child support orders in this matter are based on fraud.  The court has never considered my actual income, and simply took my checks, which reflected my actual income and doubled them for their child support purposes.  They never considered that my W-2's for the years 2011-2015 were never greater than $25,000 per year. I averaged around $20,000 to $25,000 per year.  Because of this fact, the orders are all null and void and should be voided. Child support should be recalculated based on my actual income from those years, and my arrears should be adjusted accordingly,
But she is now in danger of going back to jail for unpaid child support. Grazzini-Rucki remains on probation for parental deprivation.
As I have noted, in fact, there is a mountain of evidence that her ex-husband is a violent and abusive man.
Her two oldest daughters ran away on April 19, 2013, after being forced to live with their paternal aunt. They were hidden by Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and others until late 2015 when they were discovered.
While she argued that they were hidden for their safety, the criminal court excluded almost all evidence of abuse.