(Brian Weinstein in a text message conversation with Liz, admitting to lifelong obsession with pedophilia)
Brian Weinstein is convinced that the problem with his divorce lies exclusively with his ex-wife.
"My wife has a severe mental illness. She's been involuntarily committed to treatment; I've been given custody of my children. I have temporary orders of protection against her. I have a guardian appointed. I could go on for hours," he told me in an interview on August 11, 2021. That interview is below.
His ex-wife Elizabeth Harding Weinstein has a different perspective. She was recently interviewed extensively by Samantha Baldwin.
She also recently filed pro-se a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court.
The writ of certiorari alleges a vast conspiracy involving the courts, medical professionals, municipal employees, and police.
"In January 2021, after publicly advocating against restrictions, pedophilia and government tyranny, Elizabeth Harding Weinstein, Petitioner, was denied the services of her local government, imprisoned in solitary confinement because Petitioner could not medically tolerate a mask and remained there for seven weeks by Defendant Howard T. Code.
"After release, Petitioner filed a federal 1873 claim pro so. Defendant Judge Code retaliated, instantly had Petitioner falsely imprisoned again, absent of criminal charges, and involuntarily committed by judicial order, in clear violation of Mental Health Hygiene laws, where she, a woman on no medications her whole life, was gruesomely forced a litany of medications by judicial order of related Judge Anne E Minihan.
"Once released, Petitioner was issued an ex-parte, ex-post facto 'order' by related judge Nancy Quinn-Koba, then immediately falsely arrested for alleged violations of unserved 'order' by Defendant Officers, and given new orders by related Judge Stuart A. Halper.
"Since advocating, Petitioner, who was a stay at home mom for seventeen years, has been denied, by judicial orders: any direct access to her children; access to her home; access to all her finances; access to her belongings, all while being denied due process and access to the court in any case Petitioner is a litigant, including in Federal Court.
"Defendants, with the assistance of related Judge Janet C Malone, are now advancing an Article 81 proceeding over Petitioner to take full control over their adversary, all while her competency is self-evident."
She was able to file this writ, an example of her competency.
The writ is broken into three main parts.
Initially, on May 20, 2020, Brian Weinstein admitted to his family that he had a "lifelong history of pedophilia."
He had developed something of an obsession, Liz Weinstein told me.
She asked him to leave the house.
Brian Weinstein appeared to agree, but as the writ states, he was scheming to gain an upper hand in the upcoming divorce.
The writ breaks down into three parts: Brian Weinstein's forum shopping, the false arrest and mistreatment in prison, and the most recent attempt to have Liz placed into guardianship.
The Forum Shopping
Instead of seeking treatment, Brian Weinstein used an aggressive legal strategy.
"While Plaintiff {Liz} was placated by Defendant Officers, DAs, Defendant Weinstein quickly went on June 1, 2020, around 3:30PM, to an out of district judge, Arlene Katz with a 150 plus page 'emergency' custody petition with conflicting affidavits submitted and willful false representations in his petition.
"New custody petitions in any form were forbidden to be accepted and filed in New York State Courts under 'COVID' administrative order AO 78/20 without advanced approval, which Defendant did not have.
"At approximately 4:07 PM Defendant then filed a Family Offense Petition (FOP), with a different home address, and a conflicting affidavit.
"Defendant Weinstein's FOP alleges no Article 8 evidence, falsifies facts, and contradicts police reports (A6). Defendant Weinstein's conflicting and unlawful petitions were filed and heard ex-parte by Katz anyway, in violation of laws (A7). Katz stated, of Defendant Weinstein's conflicting petitions she was 'at a loss to read so many pages' and she 'couldn't make heads or tails of it.'
"Katz still granted Defendant Weinstein's request, assigned Petitioner, a multi-millionaire, court appointed and taxpayer paid counsel, Mr. Marco Fava, who gagged Petitioner, refused to leave the case, prevented Petitioner access to documents, and assisted Defendant Weinstein, and assigned to 'of age' children (17, almost 16, and 13) an appointed attorney, who also gagged, willfully misrepresented the children, and denied them access to the court to be heard."
According to the writ, the order Judge Katz signed went around this out of jurisdiction court like musical chairs.
"From June 5-July23, 2020, every judge in our family court jurisdiction extended Katz order and quickly recused themselves without cause, kicking the case directly back to Katz in July 2020, providing clear and convincing evidence of forum shopping."
Forum shopping is when a litigant chooses a jurisdiction, not because it's appropriate to hear a case but because they have an advantage.
In 2018, I wrote an article entitled "New Hampshire Woman Takes on Oklahoma" where a six month divorce which included the purchase of a home in New Hampshire and nothing else took six years to decide in Oklahoma, with the man, who filed in Oklahoma, getting the house eventually.
The False Arrest
In January 2021, having been denied access to the courts and unable to see her children, Liz visited her local Village Hall in Briarcliff, New York. That's where the writ says the false arrest occurred.
"On January 4, 2021, after seven months of being issued judicial orders in four different courts, but not being allowed access to the court to advocate for and defend her children, or granted any real relief, Petitioner presented to her Village Hall to file a Freedom of Information request and to file a letter in her case regarding Village Judge Howard T Code's denial of due process since July 2020 (A6).
"Unbeknownst to Petitioner at the time Defendant Court Clerk Zirman and Village Manager Zegarelli immediately contacted the Village of Briarcliff Manor Police, who resided in the same building, to remove Petitioner from the public building stating they did not wish to 'deal with her' (A24). Defendant Court Clerk Rori Zirman, and Defendant Village Manager Phillip Zegarelli, were, upon information and belief, assisting Defendant Weinstein in preventing Petitioner access to the court, and had been refusing to assist Petitioner since July 2020 (A25)."
I reached out Village Hall and the Briarcliff Police Department, specifically their Police Chief Dominick Bueti, but neither responded.
Liz continued, "Defendant Officers Wilkinson and Chief Bueti arrived, and Defendant Zegarelli asked they escort Petitioner out of the building, citing Petitioner's inability to wear a mask. Defendant Officer Wilkinson unlawfully ordered Petitioner to leave the building or be arrested and Petitioner, who had been recording the incident on her phone, complied, informing officers she would be posting the video.
"Defendant Bueti granted permission to Petitioner to hand in forms prior to leaving, but entrapped Petitioner, first closed the door on the back of Petitioner, then immediately knocked the phone and papers from Petitioner hands, pinned Petitioner up against the wall and arrested Petitioner.
"Defendant Officers charged Plaintiff with 'disorderly conduct' at the time of the arrest. then later changed the arrest to 'obstruction of government administration 2' and added resisting arrest."
Once in prison, Liz's treatment was made even worse, according to the writ, "Petitioner was brought to the police station and chained to the wall for four hours, instead of being given a ticket and being released as misdemeanor charges would dictate. At no time did any officers read Petitioner her rights. Petitioner was denied access to a lawyer or any witnesses. Defendant Officers continually refused to take exculpatory evidence."
The writ then described her treatment in prison, "Petitioner was strip searched, coerced, denied access to a lawyer, denied dietary accommodations was placed in solitary confinement and on 'suicide watch'" The writ stated, "Petitioner was in no way suicidal and expressed such to every officer and medical personnel, making it clear such designation was punitive and not 'for her safety'"
The writ continued, "At the arraignment, Defendant Code remanded petitioner to prison for seven weeks. Defendant Code then ordered a 730 'competency exam' all during 'COVID' and while petitioners competency and insight into her case, was self-evident."
Liz was eventually released on January 8, 2021, but not before she was hassled again by more psychologists trying to do exams.
"After the hearing, Petitioner was not released and was placed into solitary confinement for hours. During that time, Petitioner was visited by a 'psychologist', later known to be Jerome Norton who requested to do an exam to determine if Petitioner was 'competent'".
I reached out to the prison and to Norton, but I received no reply.
The writ continued, "Petitioner did not consent to the exam, informed the psychologist she was already technically released and simply provided clear and convincing evidence to satisfy the requirement of competency to wit: her name, address, contact year, location, names of duties of people in the courtroom, charges for which she was held and the accompanying sentence, then asked for the psychologist to leave."
Liz also alleged that several of her lawyers did not do their duties, including Richard Ferrante, who the writ said, "Mr. Ferrante was instructed by the Petitioner to take the case to an Appellate Court to immediately vacate the Code orders....On January 8, 2021, without advanced communication or notice, Judge Anne E. Minihan 'held a bail hearing at Mr. Ferrante's request, in violation of Petitioner's directive, when misdemeanors do not require bail."
I called Mr. Ferrante; he would only acknowledge serving "briefly" as Ms. Weinstein's counsel, but he declined to comment when asked about this charge.
The Guardianship
(One of several subpoenas for witnesses for Liz's guardianship hearing)
A photo of her write is below.
Two ex-parte hearings, or those without Liz, were held on June 24 and June 30 and on August 2, 2021, Judge Malone did sign a guardianship order, however Liz told me that two of those put into the order as receiving an appointment immediately petitioned to have their names removed which Liz told me makes the order "moot", I'm not as certain, but alas.
Finally, after I made initial contact with Brian Weinstein several of his supporters reached out to me to largely bad mouth Liz.
One was Piper Strong, who used a pseudonym on LinkedIn.
She said in part, "If you care to know the truth about Liz Weinstein, let me know. I have documentation of her admitting she is mentally ill. Happy to send that to you but calling her husband? Do you research on her before you reach out to anyone. There is a lot there and I’m happy to share....Want the things she did to those poor kids?? Telling her oldest 'I need to get the devil out of you' because he wore a mask. If you are only writing about Liz and not listening to anyone else, then I hope you mention that....This whole thing is not about the divorce. She filed for divorce AFTER he had to take out a restraining order on her in order to protect the kids. This has very little to do with divorce. She refused to get help or even be evaluated for her mental illness. She only filed in retaliation."
I was also contacted by Carolyn Carter who stated in part, "
She has repeatedly said that she doesn't want people to just "believe her" but that they should look at the evidence for themselves; several people have taken her up on that and have posted information online. That's how I know of this case, I have no relation to any of the parties.As for the text messages, I think it's important to understand what she means by "indoctrinated into pedophilia". Here is another video from Ms Weinstein herself where she says that her evidence of indoctrination is that her husband kept letters from his abuser: https://www.instagram.com/tv/CQwbmRNBXHO/?utm_ medium=copy_link Do you think that being trauma-bonded to an abuser is sufficient proof to accuse someone of sexual abuse themselves? I've never seen her share any evidence that he's actually committed acts of pedophilia, or even claim that she has such evidence. Maybe she's provided you with evidence of actual sexual abuse, but she hasn't shared that publicly. If I saw compelling evidence I'd be right there supporting her with you.
Liz was also interviewed by Samantha Baldwin and that interview is below.
No comments:
Post a Comment