I have found this dubious and disingenuous. First, since the public isn't privy to the information the administration claims to know, we can't say much. Second, we are always arguing against a hypothetical. We'll of course never know if the economic sky would have fallen without the bailout. Most importantly, if things were so dire, why were we only made aware when time was running out to act?
As such, the public was forced not only to swallow a massive bailout but they were forced to do it without really understanding anything about it. Then, when the terms of the bailout began changing after it was passed, the public continued to swallow it because we continued to be told that the alternative would have been a disaster. As such, the federal government essentially skirts most responsibility for creating a massive bailout, with no oversight, and one that they changed the rules on after the fact.
Now, President Designate Obama wants the public to swallow a similar pill.
President-elect Barack Obama called for "dramatic action" to pull the economy out of recession Thursday, as he made his highest-profile case yet for a nearly $800 billion stimulus plan.
Obama warned of dire consequences if Congress does not act soon, saying the crisis could "linger for years." He predicted that the steady decline would erode and eliminate everything from jobs to college educations to the country's standing in the world.
"In short, a bad situation could become dramatically worse," he said. Obama warned the unemployment rate could reach double digits and the nation "could lose a generation of potential and promise."
Obama delivered his speech a day after budget forecasters said the federal budget deficit would reach $1.2 trillion in fiscal 2009. That estimate does not factor in the stimulus package Obama and Democrats are promoting on Capitol Hill. But Obama says deficit spending is needed to jolt the economy out of recession.
Obama is no less dubious or disingenuous in his statements. Everything that held true for the current administration, holds true now. If things are so dire, why didn't Obama propose this back in September and demand that it be included with the original bailout. If we are to believe the President Designate, things are really dire just not so dire that they needed to be done in September. Apparently, things are just dire enough that the stimulus needs to be passed as soon as he gets into office.
Once again, Obama would like the public to swallow a massive bill of $800 billion without having any understanding of what it entails. We won't know how oversight will be conducted. Sure, Obama has assured us that there will be strict oversight and transparency, but so did Bush. Once again, the public is asked to swallow a massive bill that will be fast tracked through Congress with scant debate. We continue to be held at the barrel of a gun based on numbers no one will share with us. All we are told is vague and grim predictions.
The reason that the legislative process is as long as it is, is because it allows the public to understand the details of each piece of legislation. Now the government would like to by pass all of that and just ask us to accept massive spending on our behalf. Furthermore, we are told that if we do not accept it all immediately, then the economic sky will fall. We are being given economic stimulus at the barrel of a gun, and frankly, that is a recipe for disaster.
1 comment:
Concerning the previous bailout - if the banks are just "hoarding it", then the Feds could demand that it be returned. But of course, they cannot. It is all gone. It was never meant to be loaned to anyone. Somebody had to bail out the rich first.
Post a Comment