Friday, March 22, 2019

Sandra "Sam" Grazzini-Rucki Erased In Every Way Except Child Support


Even as David Rucki is chasing after his ex-wife for child support, he is also trying to collect on a trust her father set up for his grandchildren.
On March 14, 2019, David Rucki petitioned for a hearing in the Trust Created by First Amended and Restated Albert J. Grazzini Revocable Trust dated November 2, 1999.
Child Support by on Scribd

Albert Grazzini is the late father of Sandra “Sam” Grazzini-Rucki.


According to an affidavit, the hearing is to withdraw approximately $10,000 to reimburse expenses for his children which he paid out of TL Rucki Trucking, a company he claims he does not own.
Petitions the court for an order to disburse funds in the amount of $10,243.68 to Samantha Rucki from her interest bearing account deposited with the District Court Administrator for reimbursement of college tuition and costs.” According to the affidavit.
Rucki also lists four checks written from the account of TL Rucki trucking for which he wants reimbursement and presumably this is the reason for the hearing.
As I have been describing, even as he raids the trust of his dead former father-in-law, David Rucki is chasing after his ex-wife, now homeless and jobless, for $215 per month in child support
Most recently, retired judge, Kathleen Gearin, denied Grazzini-Rucki’s stay to halt child support while the appeals court looks at the case.
Petitioner’s Motion for a Stay of Proceedings is denied.” Gearin said in her March 4 order.
Even as that is occurring, David Rucki, who received a multi-million dollar business, four homes, and nine classic cars in his divorce, somehow qualifies for Minnesota Cares, which is a health care program for Minnesotans with low incomes.”
In an August 2018 ruling, Magistrate Judge Jan Davidson estimated that David Rucki makes $10,000 per month; she estimated this because she did not require him to produce any income documents.
So, he has access to a trust from a multi-millionaire, a multi-million dollar business, and receives state aid, but, according to judges in Minnesota, he should also receive child support from his homeless ex-wife, left homeless by the terms of the divorce they set out.
That is not the most shocking part. It appears that Sandra “Sam” Grazzini-Rucki is only a mother to her five children for the purposes of child support; according to a posting her daughter, Gianna, lists no one as her mother.



(As you can see, no mother listed, but simply daughter of David Rucki)

This should come as a shock to the folks at 20/20 since David Rucki claimed he wanted his children's mother in their lives. Instead, he has erased her in every way including from official records. 

I reached out to all the usual suspects. The four Minnesota Judicial public affairs officers- Lissa Finne, Kyle Christopherson, Allysa Siems-Roberson, and Beau Berentson- but none of them responded. 

Jeff Shorba is the Minnesota Court Adminstrator and he did not respond. 

Sean Dooley and Beth Mullen were the two producers on the 20/20 episode about this case and they also did not respond. 

David Rucki's list Rucki of violent acts includes  a bar fighta road rage incidentincidents of stalkingonce stuck a gun to his son Nico’s head, and chased after his daughter Samantha on her thirteenth birthday

Paul Reitman "diagnosed", by having a twenty minute meeting, Grazzini-Rucki with parental alienation. He also did not respond. 

Laura Thomas is a professor at the University of Minnesota who was interviewed for a local story on this case in 2013; she claimed that, "Mom presents the child with a toy right before the father is schedule to come (for parenting time)” as an example of parental alienation.

Jim Gilbertson took over the case in September 2012. He was accused of getting off by then teenager Samantha Rucki. 

None of them responded either. 

Listen to Samantha's recording below. 


The news feature on the Rucki case in which Thomas makes that stunning assessment is also below.

11 comments:

  1. This has happened to me. Kids have aske out. I was homeless, with cancer. Family court is a abuse system. Looks like the real winners here are the "therapists." $$$$

    ReplyDelete
  2. This has been happening since probably the late 50's,because I remember some kids in my high schoool class that it was happening to. It happened to my kids in 1971, and it is still happening now in 2019. Minds have to change, laws have to change, and most of all, divorce proceedings have to be less discriminatory.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This happened to me in Hennepin County, Minn too. Escaped abusive relationship for the safety of my kids (over dozen documented incidents of abuse + injuries) only to have family court judge and Guardian ad Litem give sole custody to perpetrator; and send kids back to abuse. The kids were abused over & over again, cries for help ignored. At age seven my child was suicidal due to abuse. I was punished for reporting abuse to authorities and challenging the corrupt judge & GAL by having my kids literally ripped from my arms, and my life.

    After years of abuse, stop talking about abuse therapy with court therapist and loss of mom - my kids suffer from trauma & anxiety. My oldest has amnesia and doesn't remember his childhood - he says he has brief flashes of images but doesnt know what they means. My youngest has trouble communicating and is not able to express herself. She has difficulty in social relationships. And most concerning, reports "memories" about me that did not happen. I believe she has been programmed by the court therapist ie brainwashed. The kids have no idea what a mother is. They have no connection to their extended family, culture or religion. They are literally lost souls - shells walking around and functioning but empty inside.

    Thank you for exposing Minnesota - truly hell on earth for fit, loving parents unjustly removed from the lives of their children by anti family court :(

    ReplyDelete
  4. Try being a man. We get a raw deal waayyyyyy more than women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have to agree, its was a plague in Indiana that the dads were stripped of everything.

      Delete
  5. Not nearly as one sided as you think. Both sides get it bad and people like you only see what you want to see.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What ever happen with this case? Just saw an old clip of this case. Trying to find out...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Whatever happened with this case? I just saw an old clip on it and really would like to know. Seeing this additional information makes me so mad at the dad's trying to get money out of the trust.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hollydoll,

    I think you should re-read the article as I describe what happened to the case. Mom is homeless, dad has everything, and daughters don't acknowledge having a mother but don't tell that to 20/20 because they will tell you that mom is responsible for everything.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The mom is NOT HOMELESS, she lives in a waterfront estate in Florida. No evidence of abuse by father yet she and her felony having fried spent time in jail. But yeah she's a good person.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You're reading too much of Michael Brodkorb's blog. Not only does she not live at a "waterfront estate" but her friend, who did live there, no longer lives there because of the harassing phone calls.

    So, when you say no evidence of abuse, how do you explain these 99 pages, https://www.scribd.com/document/403492148/Druck-i-Police-Reports

    Or these 25 pages, https://www.scribd.com/doc/316692570/SamiRucki

    Or my personal favorite, when David Rucki swore at two and three year olds, https://www.scribd.com/document/396159572/David-Ruck-i-Screaming

    Or audio recordings from both girls, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg9lJptWzk8&t=7s and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRCulTBdqHQ&t=23s

    In fact, there is so much evidence it will make your head spin. You are either taken in by propaganda or you are being paid to spread misinformation.

    ReplyDelete