tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3098264341625381422.post2688395713309590492..comments2024-03-18T17:01:07.165-07:00Comments on The Provocateur: The Second Stimulus?mike volpehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02999118519606254362noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3098264341625381422.post-38011635835520899772009-11-22T07:26:07.412-08:002009-11-22T07:26:07.412-08:00There were no tax cuts but tax credits. There is a...There were no tax cuts but tax credits. There is a difference. If it was meant to appease conservatives, they didn't do much of a job. <br /><br />None of what you say still explains why the Democrats want to spend all this money now.mike volpehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02999118519606254362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3098264341625381422.post-91607298438351977602009-11-21T19:40:36.008-08:002009-11-21T19:40:36.008-08:00"Remember, we spent $787 billion earlier in t..."Remember, we spent $787 billion earlier in the year to create jobs. If we didn't create jobs spending $787 billion, what will an extra $200 billion do? More than that, why weren't the projects in this bill put into the first bill?"<br /><br />Were you even paying attention during the first stimulus? They were taken out to appease the conservatives. That's why a Democratic spending bill was almost 50% tax cuts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com